|
Senate Interior Bill a Windfall for the Timber, Oil, Mining and Coal Industires
Washington,
D.C. As the Senate considers next year's spending, several
senators are attempting to use the FY 2000 Interior Appropriations
Bill to serve up a smorgasbord of giveaways to the timber, oil,
coal and mining industries, according to an analysis by Taxpayers
for Common Sense, a federal budget watchdog organization.
"American
taxpayers the own the trees, oil, coal and minerals on public land,"
stated Ralph DeGennaro, Executive Director, Taxpayers for Common
Sense, "The Senate is giving these taxpayer assets away at
scandalous prices."
The Senate is
scheduled to vote this week on the FY 2000 Interior Appropriations
Bill, which is riddled with wasteful provisions that benefit oil,
logging, coal and mining industries. In many cases, the Senate has
proposed millions of dollars above what the president has requested
for the coming fiscal year.
Some of the
wasteful provisions include:
- A legislative
rider sponsored by Sens. Domenici (R-NM) and Hutchison (R-TX)
that would delay a federal rule to collect $130 million in oil
royalties owed to the federal government by oil companies.
- A plan to
give $48 million more to the Forest Service to manage timber sales
than the administration requested.
- A legislative
rider sponsored by Sen. Craig (R-ID) to allow mining companies
to patent even more public land for $2.50 to $5.00 an acre to
dump their waste.
- Continuation
of a duplicative and obsolete program to fund research for private
companies to develop cleaner burning coal technologies.
Taxpayers for
Common Sense is calling for a reduction in spending and in some
cases the termination of projects in the bill.
For a copy of
The Great Senate Sellout: An Analysis of Giveaways in the Senate
Interior Bill, please call 202-546-8500 ext. 118, or go to our
website at www.taxpayer.net
###
Taxpayers for
Common Sense (TCS) is an independent budget watchdog group headquartered
in Washington, D.C. that works to cut government waste by reaching
out to taxpayers from all political perspectives
THE
GREAT SENATE SELLOUT: AN ANALYSIS OF GIVEAWAYS IN THE SENATE INTERIOR
BILL
The following
is a list of wasteful riders, programs and provisions that should
be eliminated from S. 1292, the Senate FY 2000 Interior Appropriations
Bill.
Oil Royalty
Rider
Cost: $130 million over two years
Sen. Kay Bailey
Hutchison (R-TX) and Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) have attached an
oil royalty rider that would allow oil companies to continue underpaying
royalties they pay the federal government when drilling on public
lands. The rider would delay a Department of the Interior (DOI)
rule that would stop oil companies from underpaying royalties owed
to the federal treasury, states and Native American tribes. If the
Hutchison and Domenici rider passes, the government and taxpayers
stand to lose at least another $130 million in the next two years.
The oil industry
currently owes as much as $856 million in unpaid royalties to the
federal treasury, states and Native American tribes, according to
some estimates. Congress has enabled the oil industry to continue
underpaying royalties by passing moratoriums on proposed regulations
since 1998.
Mining
Rider
Cost: millions of dollars
Sen. Larry Craig
(R-ID) has attached a rider to the Interior Bill that would cost
taxpayers millions by allowing mining companies to patent even more
public land for $2.50 to $5.00 an acre to dump their waste. The
Craig rider would effectively expand the 1872 Mining Law and make
it even worse for taxpayers.
The Craig rider
would amend one of only sensible parts of the Mining Law of 1872,
which has allowed the industry to extract more than $240 billion
of publicly owned minerals without paying a penny in royalties to
taxpayers. The law has also left taxpayers with a $32 billion to
$72 billion cleanup bill for abandoned mines.
Powerline
Provisions
Cost: $5 million this year, $40 million eventually
The Alaska delegation
is proposing that the federal government pay up to $40 million for
the Swan Lake-Lake Tyee Intertie electric powerline. The Swan Lake
project is a proposed 57-mile, $77 million electric power line connecting
the city of Ketchikans utility system to a power source at
Lake Tyee that would benefit only local electrical users. Numerous
studies, including one by the state of Alaska, have shown that there
are cheaper and more feasible alternatives to provide power to Ketchikan.
$5 million has
been provided in the bill in the form of an advanced, direct lump
sum payment to the city of Ketchikan for the construction for the
Swan Lake-Lake Tyee Intertie.
Timber
Sales Management
Cost $32 million
According to
the General Accounting Office (GAO), the U.S. Forest Service lost
$2 billion from 1992-1997 through its "Timber Sales Management"
Program. The program loses money because it charges timber companies
far less that it costs to prepare and administer the sale of trees.
Still, the Senate has requested $228.9 million for "Timber
Sales Management" this year, which is $32 million more than
the Forest Service's request.
Timber companies
should pay the full cost of preparing and administering timber sales.
Taxpayers shouldnt have to pick up the tab by annually spending
millions to cover the full cost of the Forest Service timber program.
Quincy
Library Group
Cost: $10.5 million in one year, $70 million over 5 years
The proposal
would cost taxpayers as much as $70 million over five years and
require more than 100 miles of new road construction. Forest maintenance
costs could drive the price even higher.
This year, the
committee has provided $4.5 million for implementation of the Quincy
Library Group legislation from forestland management activities
and directed the agency to retain the projected $6 million in carryover
balances from FY99 for use in FY00.
Clean
Coal Technology Program (CCTP)
Cost: Hundreds of Millions
The Senate Appropriations
Committee has recommended a deferral of $156 million for the Clean
Coal Technology Program, which means that the program would get
to spend the money later. Instead, the $156 million should be rescinded,
given back to the treasury and the whole program terminated. Taxpayers
should not have to fund this program for the following reasons:
First, strong economic incentives already exist for private companies
to develop cleaner burning coal technologies under the 1990 Clean
Air Act. Second, the program is mismanaged and inefficient. A 1991
GAO report found that a number of projects within the program had
either been terminated within a few years of funding, experienced
significant schedule delays or exceeded their budgets.
Finally, the
coal industry is a mature industry and capable of supporting its
own research and development costs.
Fossil
Fuel Research and Development
Cost: $390 million in one year
Under the Fossil
Fuel Research and Development program, taxpayers pay more than $390
million for oil, coal and utility companies research. The
committee recommended an increase of $26.9 million over the presidents
request for the program for FY2000 and $6.9 million more than the
FY99 enacted level.
Much of the
research conducted in these programs concentrates on oil and coal
exploration, production and refining research these industries
have significant market incentives to conduct with their own money.
These multi-billion dollar industries should pay for their own research
without relying on taxpayer dollars.
Forest
Health Rider
Cost: unknown
This rider would
transfer money from the Roads and Trails Fund to other Forest Service
activities. Since logging activities are already very well funded,
this sets up an incentive for the Forest Service to abuse these
funds. The rider would likely divert more taxpayer funds to money-losing
timber sales.
Tongass
Red Cedar Rider
Cost: unknown
This rider allows
mills to purchase red cedar timber in Alaska at prices far below
the actual costs of the timber sale to the government in order to
benefit Pacific Northwest mills. This subsidy to the mill operators
will encourage more logging of old-growth red cedar, since this
species tends to be less marketable before it is very old. It also
allows the Forest Service to use antiquated accounting systems that
would eliminate 60 percent of the costs to the USFS. The costs would
NOT include some road-building and administrative costs. |