Enter your email:
In this Section
TCS News Clips

TCS Press Releases

TCS Weekly Wastebasket
'What's New at TCS'

Newsroom

For Immediate Release
November 1, 2002

Contact: Keith Ashdown
(202) 546-8500 x110

Cost of Iraq Invasion Severly Underestimated;
Tens of Billions Have Been Ignored
Administration needs to release information on how to fund war, says group

Washington, D.C. - Cost estimates on the potential invasion and occupation of Iraq are alarmingly low and ignore major costs to taxpayers, says Taxpayers for Common Sense, a national budget watchdog organization.

More Information
Wastebasket Vol. VII No.38: Weighing the Costs of Invasion

“The cost of ‘regime change’ will be in the hundreds of billions of dollars,” said Nate Heasley, Program Director at Taxpayers for Common Sense. “With this new information about increased costs for the war, the Bush administration needs to immediately disclose their plan to pay for it.”

With a federal deficit expected to top $200 billion next year, the administration has some hard choices to make. News stories have reported that there could potentially be a 10% reduction in spending for some government agencies to help pay for the war.

“With no other country currently willing to pay a dime for this war, it could have major implications on spending at home. Efforts to save social security, pay for prescription drug benefits and education initiatives, and to increase domestic security will be severely affected,” continued Heasley.

If the Bush administration determines an Iraq invasion is necessary, it should only do so with both the diplomatic and financial support of allies, including those in the region that stand to benefit from Saddam Hussein’s removal. “The administration has to make it a priority to find other countries to share this financial burden or it will leave the United States in a financially and militarily vulnerable position at the same time as we are trying to win a war on terrorism,” stated Heasley.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and others have estimated that invading and occupying Iraq would cost between $40 billion and $200 billion. However, those figures do not realistically estimate the costs of deploying troops, prosecuting a war with Iraq, or the subsequent occupation of Iraq that many analysts suggest will be necessary to provide stability in the region. An Iraq war is likely to cost tens of billions more than the $200 billion estimate provided by President Bush’s lead economic advisor, Lawrence Lindsey.

The CBO underestimated or failed to include the costs of several important factors in their calculations:

Reservists/Troop Costs

This week the administration called for 265,000 reservists to be activated in preparation for a new invasion of Iraq. However, the CBO estimated that under a “heavy ground” invasion of Iraq, a total of 170,000 reservists would be necessary. 100,000 of those would be called to active combat duty, while another 70,000 would be needed to fill domestic positions left vacant by active duty personnel participating in the invasion.

Considering an increase of close to 100,000 reservists, the CBO estimate is extraordinarily low. Calling up 265,000 reservists would cost approximately $1 billion per month, If the projected invasion requires the generally accepted estimate of 3 months of build-up, 3 months of war, and 3 months of redeployment, the total cost of reserve troops would then be $9 billion.

The CBO also underestimated the cost of active troop deployment by failing to account for the baseline costs associated with the deployment of 270,000 active troops. Those baseline costs are roughly $2.8 billion per month of deployment. Over the course of a 9 month operation, that amounts to $25.3 billion.

Additionally, the cost of deploying the heavy ground troops, combat hazard pay, and other expenses associated with moving both the 270,000 active and at least 100,000 reserve troops to the region amount to an additional $38 billion over the course of the war, excluding operating support and fuel. The total cost of troop deployment alone for an invasion of Iraq would be an additional $59.6 billion, for a total troop deployment cost of almost $100 billion.

Veterans Benefits
During the Gulf War, the United States suffered casualties. Not only were more than 100 servicemen and women killed in action, but a much greater number appear to have been exposed to chemical or biological agents causing a host of symptoms collectively called “Gulf War Syndrome.” Thousands of servicemen and women have suffered. Our servicemen and women deserve the best medical treatment (and probably more) that this country can provide, but it comes at a cost; with over 100,000 servicemen and women from the Gulf War alone on disability benefits, the cost of treating the Gulf War Syndrome is more than $2 billion a year.

In a new invasion of Iraq, the United States would likely suffer similar if not greater losses. According to many analysts, because of the desperation of Saddam Hussein to retain power, there is a greater likelihood that Iraq will use chemical or biological weapons. Even fighting a lost war, Hussein will likely exact as much revenge as possible. If similar casualties are incurred, the subsequent benefits for servicemen and women after the new invasion of Iraq could likely approach $100 billion over a 50-year span.

Occupation
Occupation forces will be necessary to transition Iraq from the oppressive dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. Given our recent experiences in Afghanistan, and Bosnia/Kosovo, the occupying force will likely be about 100,000 troops. At an annual cost of $220,000 to deploy and support each peacekeeper, the cost of the first year of occupation would be $18-$22 billion. Over a likely five-year occupation, during which time the number of forces necessary could drop to 50,000, occupying Iraq and stabilizing the region could be at least $50 billion.

Cost estimates are crucial to providing the public the ability to consider the level of investment that will be needed for this military action.

“Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to write a blank check for a war on Iraq. We deserve to know what sacrifices we will need to make at home in order to fund the war. It is vital that we are provided accurate cost estimates, but based on our initial research, this war is likely to cost tens of billions more than has been advertised,” concluded Heasley.

###

Taxpayers for Common Sense is a non-partisan budget watchdog that serves as an independent voice for American taxpayers.  Now in its second decade of service to the nation, TCS works to ensure that our government spends taxpayer money efficiently and responsibly by working to eliminate wasteful and harmful federal spending.

651 Pennsylvania Ave, SE | Washington, DC 20003 | 1-800-taxpayer | fax: 202-546-8511