Letters & Testimony

Coalition Letter Opposing Clean Energy Deployment Administration

TCS RSS Feed RSS
May 25, 2011
Programs: Energy

Taxpayers for Common Sense and a coalition of groups sent a letter to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee calling for them to oppose the Clean Energy Deployment Administration.

Download: Joint Letter - Stop the Clean Energy Deployment Administration - May 2011


 

 

May 26, 2011 

 

STOP THE CLEAN ENERGY DEPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION

 

Dear Energy and Natural Resources Committee Member,

We understand that you will be considering legislation this week to create a new federal financing entity known as the Clean Energy Deployment Administration (CEDA). CEDA’s goal is to provide loans, loan guarantees, and other forms of credit to various energy projects, but as envisioned the end result could easily be little more than a black hole for hundreds of billions of taxpayer losses on failed projects. In addition to funding high risk capital intensive projects with long-term financial liabilities the size, scope and lack of accountability and transparency mechanisms make CEDA ripe for waste, fraud and abuse. We urge you to oppose the creation of CEDA.

As proposed, CEDA would have unlimited authority to issue loan guarantees to high risk projects, while providing little oversight and taxpayer protections. When evaluating CEDA the Congressional Budget Office estimated that based on the 2008 applications to the existing loan guarantee program, CEDA would provide more than $130 billion in loan guarantees. CEDA has a $10 billion initial capitalization and no limit on the total volume of loans it can issue, creating an enormous financial liability on the federal Treasury.

CEDA creates a new larger financing mechanism for energy technologies and absorbs the existing Department of Energy Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program which already has significant problems. The new entity will remain under DOE and distribute direct loans, loan guarantees and other forms of credit for energy technologies ranging from renewable solar and efficiency to advanced nuclear and coal facilities. With a charge this expansive, it is easy to imagine enormous financial fallout for U.S. taxpayers.

With a $1.65 trillion deficit and a $14 trillion debt, we all agree that it would be reckless for Congress to allow this program to move forward. We urge you to oppose CEDA.

Sincerely,

Ryan Alexander, President                       Duane Parde, President
Taxpayers for Common Sense                  National Taxpayers Union

Myron Ebell, President                             William Yeatman, Assistant Director
Freedom Action                                       Competitive Enterprise Institute

Henry Sokolski, Executive Director            Phil Kerpen, Vice President for Policy
Non-Proliferation Policy Education Center  Americans for Prosperity

Paul Gessing, President                          Barbara Anderson, Executive Director
Rio Grande Foundation                            Citizens for Limited Taxation 
       

 

Filed under: Stop Waste, Cut Subsidies, Prioritize Investments

Discussion
Weekly Wastebasket

Our weekly reality-check for federal spending. View All

September 13, 2013

Syria: Excuse 535 To Not Cut the Deficit

Volume XVIII No. 37 Possible action in Syria has become the most recent excuse du jour for Pentagon boosters... Read More