In The News

Mckibben: Activists should be ‘willfully naive’ in oil subsidy, climate battle (The Hill)

TCS RSS Feed RSS
May 09, 2012
Programs:

by Ben Geman

A prominent environmentalist is suggesting an outside-the-box political strategy for climate advocates seeking to end oil industry tax breaks and stop the Keystone XL pipeline: naivete.

Bill McKibben, founder of the climate group 350.org, stood in front of the Capitol Thursday and warned against “taking it for granted that this is always how it has to be, that realism . . . is just people taking the money and doing the bidding of big industry.”

“We no longer have the margin to allow that to be the way it is,” he said at a press conference. “Now we have to actually be kind of willfully naive and demand that our system work the way that it is supposed to work.”

McKibben spoke at the rollout of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison’s (D-Minn.) new bill that would strip tax incentives and other federal financial support from the oil-and-gas and coal industries.

Multiple speakers touting the bill used the event to decry the amount of money sloshing around lobbying and politics, criticizing the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC that allows unlimited corporate spending in elections.

McKibben has been a key organizer of high-profile protests against the proposed Keystone XL oil sands pipeline.

Asked about the “naive” remark afterward, he said that addressing money in politics is central to advancing green movement goals.

“I think sometimes people are so used to the idea that money controls Washington, that though they hate it, they sort of think, ‘oh that’s just how it is, how it has to be,’ and if that is how it has to be, then I don’t think there is any way we can deal with these problems,” he said.

The oil-and-gas and coal mining industries spent a combined $167 million on lobbying in 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, and are also active in political giving.

The new bill, which sponsors say would end $113 billion in federal support for fossil fuels over a decade, stands almost no chance of passage.

Ellison said advocates need to expand their coalition.

“I am so excited about being here today to see the coalition that is emerging, but the coalition is . . . not big enough. We have got to mass many, many people and reach out across all across this nation so that we can say something very, very simple, and that is rich companies, rich corporations should not get subsidies on top of the big stream of profits that they already have,” he said.

The bill has the support of 350.org, Taxpayers for Common Sense, Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, Oil Change International and Earthjustice, according to Sanders’ office.

The bill would repeal a large array of incentives, such as provisions in the tax code that allow oil companies to quickly deduct certain drilling costs and claim a lucrative tax break for domestic manufacturing.

It also targets federal funding for fossil fuel R&D, strips royalty waivers for deepwater oil-and-gas production, and many other expenditures and incentives.

“Our legislation is the most comprehensive ever introduced on this subject. It ends all of the tax breaks, all of the special financing arrangements, and all of the federal research and development funding,” Sanders said.

McKibben said that current policy provides the fossil fuel sectors a "performance bonus" for environmental damage.

Mckibben: Activists should be ‘willfully naive’ in oil subsidy, climate battle (The Hill)

Discussion
Weekly Wastebasket

Our weekly reality-check for federal spending. View All

September 13, 2013

Syria: Excuse 535 To Not Cut the Deficit

Volume XVIII No. 37 Possible action in Syria has become the most recent excuse du jour for Pentagon boosters... Read More