Statements

TCS Statement on Senate Farm Subsidy Vote

TCS RSS Feed RSS
November 03, 2005

The following is a written statement by Jill Lancelot, President of Taxpayers for Common Sense, on the Senate refusal to cut billions in handouts for the nation’s largest and richest farms.

With this vote, Senators seem to be unwilling or unable to protect small family farmers and taxpayers. The amendment offered by Senator’s Grassley (R-IA), Dorgan (D-ND) and Clinton (D-NY) would have ended billions of dollars of farm subsidies to absentee investors, rich landowners, and fat-cat farmers. Despite the cheap rhetoric about deficits and fiscal discipline, advancing trade, and free-markets, when lawmakers had a choice they sided with the powerful farm lobby and continued doling out millions to corporate agribusinesses instead of protecting taxpayers and rural America. This vote shows that the Senators are not serious about cutting wasteful spending in the budget reconciliation, but would rather continue to be the champions for waste and corporate welfare in the farm subsidy system.

Since 1998, average annual farm payments have risen from $7 billion to $18 billion. The FY 2006 budget estimates farm subsidy spending will top $24 billion this year. Worse, farm payments have become increasingly concentrated, flowing to fewer and fewer individual farmers. According to the USDA, only 8 percent of producers receive 78 percent of subsidies. At the top of the subsidy food chain, huge corporate operations receive payments in the millions, while the average for 80 percent of farmers is under $1,000.

The Grassley-Dorgan-Clinton Amendment would have lowered the current farm payment limit from $360,000 to a $250,000 per farm-couple cap. More importantly, it would have closed loopholes that have historically made the present limit so porous as to be non-existent. The Grassley-Dorgan amendment would also have restored the bulk of funding to the non-trade distorting Conservation Reserve and Conservation Security Programs, both of which continue to be supported by President Bush.

The amendment was offered to the Deficit Reduction Reconciliation Act 2005 and was defeated 46-53. Due to budget reconciliation specific rules, a vote of 60 was necessary for passage. In previous years iterations of the Grassley-Dorgan amendment have passed the Senate only to be stripped in conference by the Agriculture Committees.

Filed under: Cut Subsidies, Eliminate Corporate Welfare

Discussion
Weekly Wastebasket

Our weekly reality-check for federal spending. View All

September 13, 2013

Syria: Excuse 535 To Not Cut the Deficit

Volume XVIII No. 37 Possible action in Syria has become the most recent excuse du jour for Pentagon boosters... Read More