Taxpayers for Common Sense submitted the following comments to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) related to the “Sustainable Aviation Fuel Credit” created in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The comments are focused on implementation of the new tax credit which could cost taxpayers billions of dollars in the future. TCS urged Treasury/IRS to ensure that high-carbon, first generation biofuel feedstocks such as corn, soybean oil, and woody biomass do not become eligible for federal tax credits at the expense of consumers, taxpayers, the climate, and environment.
The comments can be viewed below or downloaded here.
Comments
Inflation Reduction Act: Treasury Comments on Sustainable Aviation Fuel Credit
Ensuring high carbon biofuels are not furthered subsidized by taxpayers should be a priority
Taxpayers for Common Sense submitted the following comments to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) related to the “Sustainable Aviation Fuel Credit” created in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The comments are focused on implementation of the new tax credit which could cost taxpayers billions of dollars in the future. TCS urged Treasury/IRS to ensure that high-carbon, first generation biofuel feedstocks such as corn, soybean oil, and woody biomass do not become eligible for federal tax credits at the expense of consumers, taxpayers, the climate, and environment.
The comments can be viewed below or downloaded here.
Share This Story!
Related Posts
America’s Vanishing Carbon Ledger: What the Methane Rollback Means for Taxpayers
Fact-checking Chris Wright on energy
Comments on Delay of EPA Rule to Curb Methane Waste
Comments on EPA Proposal to Repeal Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
Federal oil and gas sale commences with new, lower royalty rates
Oil and gas leases earn $22.8 million, but some taxpayers doubt benefits
Most Read
Recent Content
Weekly Wastebasket
Get Back to Work
Our Take
America’s Vanishing Carbon Ledger: What the Methane Rollback Means for Taxpayers
Op-Ed
Put this nuclear missile on the back of a truck — but we still don’t need it
Our Take
The Anti-Deficiency Act, Explained the Hard Way
Stay up to date on our work.
Sign up for our newsletter.
"*" indicates required fields