Taxpayers for Common Sense (TCS) submitted comments to the Environmental Protection Agency on the supplemental proposed rule.
“Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program: Standards for 2026 and 2027, Partial Waiver of 2025 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirement, and Other Changes; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.”
The federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program requires companies to blend a certain amount of biofuels with U.S. transportation fuel each year. The RFS was established in 2005, greatly expanded in 2007, and continues today despite its failure to benefit consumers, the farm economy, the environment, or taxpayers.
In its latest September 2025 rulemaking, EPA proposed a reallocation of a portion of the mandate exempted for small fuel refiners, meaning large fuel refiners would be forced to make up the difference. If finalized, this proposal will increase annual mandates for biofuel consumption, which may increase biofuel production and cause more harm to consumers, taxpayers, and the environment.
Comments
Comments on Renewable Fuel Standard RVO Reallocation
Taxpayers for Common Sense (TCS) submitted comments to the Environmental Protection Agency on the supplemental proposed rule.
“Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program: Standards for 2026 and 2027, Partial Waiver of 2025 Cellulosic Biofuel Volume Requirement, and Other Changes; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.”
The federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program requires companies to blend a certain amount of biofuels with U.S. transportation fuel each year. The RFS was established in 2005, greatly expanded in 2007, and continues today despite its failure to benefit consumers, the farm economy, the environment, or taxpayers.
In its latest September 2025 rulemaking, EPA proposed a reallocation of a portion of the mandate exempted for small fuel refiners, meaning large fuel refiners would be forced to make up the difference. If finalized, this proposal will increase annual mandates for biofuel consumption, which may increase biofuel production and cause more harm to consumers, taxpayers, and the environment.
Share This Story!
Related Posts
Wyoming Oil & Gas Lease Sale Could Cost $50 Million in Royalty Revenue
Colorado Oil & Gas Lease Sale Could Cost $20 Million in Royalty Revenue
Taxpayer Analysis of Proposed Rescission of 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule
Colorado Newsline: BLM oil and gas leases threaten critical Colorado wildlife corridors, lawsuit says
New Report Finds Outdated Federal Oil and Gas Terms Cost Taxpayers Billions in Wyoming
Wyoming’s Federal Oil and Gas Leasing, and What It Has Cost Taxpayers
Most Read
Recent Content
Our Take
Wyoming Oil & Gas Lease Sale Could Cost $50 Million in Royalty Revenue
Our Take
Colorado Oil & Gas Lease Sale Could Cost $20 Million in Royalty Revenue
In The News
PolitiFact: Can Trump give Americans $5,000 if Republicans win midterms? It’d be complicated and expensive
Weekly Wastebasket
The Greatest Trade Deal Ever, Until It Wasn’t
Stay up to date on our work.
Sign up for our newsletter.
"*" indicates required fields